New Year, New Words: Disambiguation

As we move into 2026, brands are coming to terms with a difficult new reality. Traffic is declining. Clicks are harder to earn. And the familiar search journey — query, results page, website visit — is increasingly replaced by answers delivered directly inside AI-driven interfaces like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.

In this world, visibility no longer guarantees visits. Instead, it delivers influence. And influence depends on whether machines can confidently understand who you are.

Many SEO providers frame this shift as simply “SEO for LLMs.” That idea is comforting, but it misses something fundamental. Answer engines don’t work like search engines. They don’t rank pages so much as reason about entities. And that means brands now need a parallel strategy — one focused on machine-readable markup, entity optimisation rather than keyword targeting, and authority building that goes far beyond links.

At the centre of this strategy sits a word that will define digital success in 2026: disambiguation.

From Keywords to Meaning

Traditional SEO asked a simple question: What keywords do you want to rank for?
Answer engines ask a very different one: What entity are you?

Entities are people, organisations, products, places, and concepts that machines can uniquely identify and connect to other facts. When an answer engine references your brand, it is not matching text strings. It is attempting to resolve a specific entity inside a knowledge graph.

If it cannot do that confidently, one of three things happens:

1. You are confused with another entity.
   
   
2. Your authority is diluted.
   
   
3. You are excluded entirely.
   
   

This is where disambiguation becomes critical.

A Real-World Example: ISP

One of my clients often uses an acronym colloquially instead of its full name, that acronym being “ISP”.

To humans, this shorthand makes perfect sense. To machines, it is a nightmare.

“ISP” is most commonly understood as Internet Service Provider. It can also refer to technical protocols, industry bodies, academic terms, and dozens of unrelated organisations across different sectors and geographies. This is not a theoretical risk. In an answer engine context, ambiguity leads to hesitation. And hesitation leads to silence.

If a system cannot confidently resolve “ISP” to your brand name rather than Internet Service Provider (telecommunications), it will often avoid referencing either. That is the hidden cost of ambiguity.

Disambiguation Is About Reducing Cognitive Load for Machines

Disambiguation is the practice of removing doubt. It ensures that when your brand name, acronym, or leadership team is mentioned, machines can resolve that reference to one specific, authoritative entity.

Any time your brand name could plausibly mean something else, you have a disambiguation problem.

Common risk scenarios include:

• Acronyms (ISP, ABC, CMS, AI)
  
  
• Founder names shared with public figures
  
  
• Generic business names (“Global Consulting”, “Summit Group”)
  
  
• Products named after common words
  
  
• Rebrands that retain legacy terminology
  
  

Humans use context instinctively. Machines require explicit signals.

Authority Now Comes From Consistency, Not Just Links

In the pre-LLM era, backlinks acted as votes of confidence. Today, authority is increasingly inferred through cross-source consistency.

Answer engines validate facts by triangulating:

• Wikidata
  
  
• Wikipedia
  
  
• Google Knowledge Graph
  
  
• Authoritative industry databases
  
  
• Structured data on your own site
  
  

If these sources agree on who you are, what you do, and how you relate to other entities, confidence increases. If they disagree — or fail to connect — your authority weakens.

This is why disambiguation is not just technical hygiene. It is reputation management for machines.

Why sameAs Is Your New Best Friend

The single most powerful tool in disambiguation is the sameAs property in structured data.

sameAs explicitly tells machines that your organisation, person, or product is identical to an entity referenced elsewhere. Used properly, it creates a web of certainty.

For example:

• Your organisation page can point to its Wikidata item
  
  
• Leadership profiles can reference verified biographies
  
  
• Awards can link to recognised issuing bodies
  
  
• Research or thought leadership can be tied to authoritative publishers
  
  

In the case of International Schools Partnership, sameAs connections help machines understand that:

• ISP (education) ≠ ISP (telecommunications)
  
  
• The organisation operates schools, not networks
  
  
• Its leadership and achievements belong to the education sector
  
  

This clarity dramatically increases the likelihood of accurate citation inside answer engines.

This Is a Brand Strategy Problem, Not Just an SEO One

A common mistake is treating disambiguation as something developers “add later.” In reality, the hardest part isn’t the markup — it’s the decisions behind it.

Disambiguation forces brands to answer uncomfortable but necessary questions:

• What is our canonical name?
  
  
• When is shorthand acceptable, and when is it dangerous?
  
  
• Who are our key public-facing experts?
  
  
• Which achievements genuinely define authority?
  
  
• Which external sources do we want machines to trust?
  
  

Without alignment on these points, structured data simply encodes confusion at scale.

Visibility Without Clicks

As clicks decline, brands will increasingly measure some of their success by presence inside answers rather than visits to pages. Are you named? Are you cited? Are your people referenced as experts? None of that will happen reliably without disambiguation.

In 2026, influence belongs to brands that machines can understand with confidence.

Keywords tell machines what you talk about.
Disambiguation tells them who you are.

And in an answer-first world, that difference is everything.

‍